In latter weeks several writers have argued that when it proceeds to understanding men and women biology matters more than agriculture These writers interpret bits of disconnected data to reassert the old-fashioned dichotomies of men versus women of biology versus tillage From Andrew Sullivan to Christina "I am not a feminist.

In latter weeks several writers have argued that when it proceeds to understanding men and women biology matters more than agriculture These writers interpret bits of disconnected data to reassert the old-fashioned dichotomies of men versus women of biology versus tillage From Andrew Sullivan to Christina "I am not a feminist, however I make my money attacking them" Hoff Summer to scientists who theorize rape as evolutionary adaptation, the just discovered wave avers that it is men who are the individuals stigmatized, not women. So the 21st hundred starts where the 19th hundred left off: with a whole industry of revisionists trying to save the males from the apparently destabilizing idea that men are equal to women

Men are addicted to and in some way produced by testosterone--which makes them at one time more exciting, excellent at politics, dominant at sports, and tragically misunderstood, says Andrew Sullivan, arguing, as he oftentimes does, that men are more interesting than women because he is the same Male rape (of women or men) is "a natural, biological phenomenon that is a yield of the human evolutionary heritage," say biologist Randy Thornhill and anthropologist Craig Palmer in a recent book that argues that male rapists are utterly genes seeking survival, not the monstrous expression of centuries of misogyny.

To speculate that rape is inevitable and unruffled necessary is to carry male defensiveness to recently made known heights of absurdity. And to view revelation in the truism that testosterone and estrogen breed differences in men and women is like seeing the Virgin Mary in a novel Jersey backyard: It reveals more about the faith of the beholder than about the vision beheld.

It present the appearances to me that these writers and thinkers resort to biology because they are threatened on the power of culture and the evidence of history. The history of greatest in quantity civilizations teaches us that biology has always been used as a rationalization to limit women's freedom--and that until the past three decades women's options have been grossly constricted. Male hormones might be a factor in the dominance of men in politics, nevertheless gosh, could it also derive from the fact that American women were not allowed to consecrated by a vow until 80 years ago or that they were required to stay at family circle to raise the children and hasten households while men had the public life? in like manner what if the average man breeds ten to 20 times as a great deal testosterone as the average woman and the average woman causes more estrogen than the average man?

Heterosexuality is built forward the idea that biology is destiny. Do gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered the public really want to embrace this notion? Straight civilization values maleness over femaleness, and this dichotomous thinking dominates each one of its institutions--from family to religion. Straight family are so trapped by these notions of male or female, dominant or submissive, father or mother that they fare into a crisis when their lives do not run after a fantasy script. How can I be a man if she works outside the house? I am not a real woman unles I am a mother. He must be a fag because he is effeminate.

Is it any curious awe that gayness, lesbianism, bisexuality, or transgenderism is thus threatening to straight people? Our lives attest that destiny is more than evolution: that steady if desire is biologically based, it is as abundant culturally constructed. Our relationships defect rigid gender roles. We procreate without heterosexuality. In deep-felt ways we disrupt the idea that biology means a particular, heterosexist destiny.

Analyzing the interrelationship of biology and improvement is more interesting than "proving" the dominance of individual over the other. Maybe this is with what intent Sullivan's article on testosterone made me for a like reason irritated and so sad. Perhaps dealing with feelings of inadequacy as a gay man--created by the agency of parents who don't accept you entirely a church that shuns your sexual exultation and a society that derides you as a half man--is harder than reducing the "he in me" to a gold-colored liquid that looks like cooking oil.

It's time to act upon beyond the tired dualism of male versus female and forward to the more imaginative position of "intersection." Male and female intersect in the same body; therein lies the ultimate heresy and prophecy.

...

Home